Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro vs Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC
How the Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro and the Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro | Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 218 mi | 245 mi |
| Usable battery | 64.7 kWh | 66.5 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 20.9 kWh/100 km | 18.1 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2022 | 2022 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro | Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 145 mi | 163 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 207 mi | 233 mi |
| Motorway | 170 mi | 191 mi |
| City | 235 mi | 265 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC
- Further in winter
- Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC
- More efficient
- Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro or the Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro is rated 218 mi and the Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC 245 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 145 mi from the Audi e-tron Sportback 50 quattro and 163 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQB 300 4MATIC.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.