Audi Q4 e-tron 40 vs MG Cyberster
How the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 and the MG Cyberster compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. The EPA rating is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | MG Cyberster | |
|---|---|---|
| EPA range | 318 mi | 315 mi |
| Usable battery | 76.6 kWh | 74 kWh |
| Rated consumption | 16.7 kWh/100 km | 14.6 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2022 | 2025 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Audi Q4 e-tron 40 | MG Cyberster | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 210 mi | 209 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 301 mi | 300 mi |
| Highway | 248 mi | 245 mi |
| City | 343 mi | 341 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (EPA)
- Audi Q4 e-tron 40
- Further in winter
- Audi Q4 e-tron 40
- More efficient
- MG Cyberster
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 or the MG Cyberster?
- On the EPA rating the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 is rated 318 mi and the MG Cyberster 315 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 210 mi from the Audi Q4 e-tron 40 and 209 mi from the MG Cyberster.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the energy use per mile, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.