BYD Atto 3 EVO vs Peugeot e-3008
How the BYD Atto 3 EVO and the Peugeot e-3008 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| BYD Atto 3 EVO | Peugeot e-3008 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 317 mi | 327 mi |
| Usable battery | 74.8 kWh | 73 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 11.8 kWh/100 km | 15 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2026 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| BYD Atto 3 EVO | Peugeot e-3008 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 210 mi | 217 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 301 mi | 311 mi |
| Motorway | 247 mi | 255 mi |
| City | 342 mi | 354 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Peugeot e-3008
- Further in winter
- Peugeot e-3008
- More efficient
- BYD Atto 3 EVO
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the BYD Atto 3 EVO or the Peugeot e-3008?
- On the official WLTP cycle the BYD Atto 3 EVO is rated 317 mi and the Peugeot e-3008 327 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 210 mi from the BYD Atto 3 EVO and 217 mi from the Peugeot e-3008.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.