BYD Atto 3 vs Toyota Urban Cruiser
How the BYD Atto 3 and the Toyota Urban Cruiser compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. The EPA rating is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| BYD Atto 3 | Toyota Urban Cruiser | |
|---|---|---|
| EPA range | 261 mi | 265 mi |
| Usable battery | 60.5 kWh | 58 kWh |
| Rated consumption | 16 kWh/100 km | 13.6 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2025 | 2026 |
Real-world range, side by side
| BYD Atto 3 | Toyota Urban Cruiser | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 173 mi | 175 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 248 mi | 252 mi |
| Highway | 204 mi | 206 mi |
| City | 282 mi | 286 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (EPA)
- Toyota Urban Cruiser
- Further in winter
- Toyota Urban Cruiser
- More efficient
- Toyota Urban Cruiser
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the BYD Atto 3 or the Toyota Urban Cruiser?
- On the EPA rating the BYD Atto 3 is rated 261 mi and the Toyota Urban Cruiser 265 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 173 mi from the BYD Atto 3 and 175 mi from the Toyota Urban Cruiser.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the energy use per mile, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.