Fisker Ocean vs IM by MG IM5
How the Fisker Ocean and the IM by MG IM5 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Fisker Ocean | IM by MG IM5 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 391 mi | 407 mi |
| Usable battery | 100 kWh | 100 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2023 | 2026 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Fisker Ocean | IM by MG IM5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 259 mi | 270 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 372 mi | 386 mi |
| Motorway | 305 mi | 318 mi |
| City | 423 mi | 439 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- IM by MG IM5
- Further in winter
- IM by MG IM5
- More efficient
- IM by MG IM5
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Fisker Ocean or the IM by MG IM5?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Fisker Ocean is rated 391 mi and the IM by MG IM5 407 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 259 mi from the Fisker Ocean and 270 mi from the IM by MG IM5.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.