Fisker Ocean vs Zeekr 7X
How the Fisker Ocean and the Zeekr 7X compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Fisker Ocean | Zeekr 7X | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 391 mi | 382 mi |
| Usable battery | 100 kWh | 100 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 14.6 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2023 | 2025 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Fisker Ocean | Zeekr 7X | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 259 mi | 253 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 372 mi | 363 mi |
| Motorway | 305 mi | 298 mi |
| City | 423 mi | 413 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Fisker Ocean
- Further in winter
- Fisker Ocean
- More efficient
- Zeekr 7X
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Fisker Ocean or the Zeekr 7X?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Fisker Ocean is rated 391 mi and the Zeekr 7X 382 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 259 mi from the Fisker Ocean and 253 mi from the Zeekr 7X.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.