Lexus UX 300e vs Peugeot e-Rifter
How the Lexus UX 300e and the Peugeot e-Rifter compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. The EPA rating is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Lexus UX 300e | Peugeot e-Rifter | |
|---|---|---|
| EPA range | 195 mi | 199 mi |
| Usable battery | 54.4 kWh | 50 kWh |
| Rated consumption | 16.9 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2020 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Lexus UX 300e | Peugeot e-Rifter | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 129 mi | 132 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 185 mi | 189 mi |
| Highway | 152 mi | 155 mi |
| City | 211 mi | 215 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (EPA)
- Peugeot e-Rifter
- Further in winter
- Peugeot e-Rifter
- More efficient
- Lexus UX 300e
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Lexus UX 300e or the Peugeot e-Rifter?
- On the EPA rating the Lexus UX 300e is rated 195 mi and the Peugeot e-Rifter 199 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 129 mi from the Lexus UX 300e and 132 mi from the Peugeot e-Rifter.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the energy use per mile, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.