Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 vs Volvo EX30
How the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 and the Volvo EX30 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 | Volvo EX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 285 mi | 296 mi |
| Usable battery | 66.5 kWh | 65 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 14.4 kWh/100 km | 17 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 | Volvo EX30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 188 mi | 196 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 270 mi | 281 mi |
| Motorway | 222 mi | 231 mi |
| City | 308 mi | 319 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Volvo EX30
- Further in winter
- Volvo EX30
- More efficient
- Mercedes-Benz EQA 250
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 or the Volvo EX30?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 is rated 285 mi and the Volvo EX30 296 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 188 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQA 250 and 196 mi from the Volvo EX30.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.