Mercedes-Benz EQB vs Renault Megane E-Tech
How the Mercedes-Benz EQB and the Renault Megane E-Tech compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQB | Renault Megane E-Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 321 mi | 311 mi |
| Usable battery | 70.5 kWh | 67 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 13.9 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2027 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQB | Renault Megane E-Tech | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 213 mi | 206 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 305 mi | 295 mi |
| Motorway | 250 mi | 242 mi |
| City | 347 mi | 336 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Mercedes-Benz EQB
- Further in winter
- Mercedes-Benz EQB
- More efficient
- Renault Megane E-Tech
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQB or the Renault Megane E-Tech?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mercedes-Benz EQB is rated 321 mi and the Renault Megane E-Tech 311 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 213 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQB and 206 mi from the Renault Megane E-Tech.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.