Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV vs Volvo EX90
How the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and the Volvo EX90 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, highway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV | Volvo EX90 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 380 mi | 382 mi |
| Usable battery | 108.4 kWh | 107 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 19 kWh/100 km | 19.9 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2025 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV | Volvo EX90 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 252 mi | 253 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 360 mi | 362 mi |
| Motorway | 296 mi | 298 mi |
| City | 410 mi | 412 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Volvo EX90
- Further in winter
- Volvo EX90
- More efficient
- Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV or the Volvo EX90?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV is rated 380 mi and the Volvo EX90 382 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 252 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQS SUV and 253 mi from the Volvo EX90.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.