Audi e-tron S Sportback quattro vs BYD Tang
How the Audi e-tron S Sportback quattro and the BYD Tang compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Audi e-tron S Sportback quattro | BYD Tang | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 231 mi | 249 mi |
| Usable battery | 86.5 kWh | 85.4 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 25.1 kWh/100 km | 24.3 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2022 | 2023 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Audi e-tron S Sportback quattro | BYD Tang | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 153 mi | 165 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 219 mi | 236 mi |
| Motorway | 180 mi | 194 mi |
| City | 250 mi | 268 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- BYD Tang
- Further in winter
- BYD Tang
- More efficient
- BYD Tang
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Audi e-tron S Sportback quattro or the BYD Tang?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Audi e-tron S Sportback quattro is rated 231 mi and the BYD Tang 249 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 153 mi from the Audi e-tron S Sportback quattro and 165 mi from the BYD Tang.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.