Audi Q4 e-tron vs Cupra Tavascan
How the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Cupra Tavascan compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Audi Q4 e-tron | Cupra Tavascan | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 349 mi | 353 mi |
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 77 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 13.7 kWh/100 km | 15.7 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Audi Q4 e-tron | Cupra Tavascan | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 231 mi | 234 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 332 mi | 336 mi |
| Motorway | 272 mi | 275 mi |
| City | 377 mi | 381 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Cupra Tavascan
- Further in winter
- Cupra Tavascan
- More efficient
- Audi Q4 e-tron
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Audi Q4 e-tron or the Cupra Tavascan?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Audi Q4 e-tron is rated 349 mi and the Cupra Tavascan 353 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 231 mi from the Audi Q4 e-tron and 234 mi from the Cupra Tavascan.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.