Citroën AMI vs Mazda MX-30
How the Citroën AMI and the Mazda MX-30 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Citroën AMI | Mazda MX-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 47 mi | 124 mi |
| Usable battery | 5.4 kWh | 30 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 7.2 kWh/100 km | 19 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Citroën AMI | Mazda MX-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 31 mi | 82 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 44 mi | 118 mi |
| Motorway | 37 mi | 97 mi |
| City | 50 mi | 134 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Mazda MX-30
- Further in winter
- Mazda MX-30
- More efficient
- Citroën AMI
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Citroën AMI or the Mazda MX-30?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Citroën AMI is rated 47 mi and the Mazda MX-30 124 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 31 mi from the Citroën AMI and 82 mi from the Mazda MX-30.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.