Citroën ë-C4 vs Škoda Epiq
How the Citroën ë-C4 and the Škoda Epiq compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Citroën ë-C4 | Škoda Epiq | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 258 mi | 273 mi |
| Usable battery | 51 kWh | 51.7 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 14 kWh/100 km | 13.7 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2027 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Citroën ë-C4 | Škoda Epiq | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 171 mi | 181 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 245 mi | 260 mi |
| Motorway | 201 mi | 213 mi |
| City | 278 mi | 295 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Škoda Epiq
- Further in winter
- Škoda Epiq
- More efficient
- Škoda Epiq
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Citroën ë-C4 or the Škoda Epiq?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Citroën ë-C4 is rated 258 mi and the Škoda Epiq 273 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 171 mi from the Citroën ë-C4 and 181 mi from the Škoda Epiq.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.