Fisker Ocean vs Polestar 4
How the Fisker Ocean and the Polestar 4 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Fisker Ocean | Polestar 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 391 mi | 385 mi |
| Usable battery | 100 kWh | 100 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.9 kWh/100 km | 17.8 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2023 | 2026 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Fisker Ocean | Polestar 4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 259 mi | 255 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 372 mi | 366 mi |
| Motorway | 305 mi | 301 mi |
| City | 423 mi | 416 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Fisker Ocean
- Further in winter
- Fisker Ocean
- More efficient
- Fisker Ocean
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Fisker Ocean or the Polestar 4?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Fisker Ocean is rated 391 mi and the Polestar 4 385 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 259 mi from the Fisker Ocean and 255 mi from the Polestar 4.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.