Ford Mustang Mach-E vs Mercedes-Benz C
How the Ford Mustang Mach-E and the Mercedes-Benz C compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Ford Mustang Mach-E | Mercedes-Benz C | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 379 mi | 368 mi |
| Usable battery | 91 kWh | 94 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 16.5 kWh/100 km | 18.5 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2027 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Ford Mustang Mach-E | Mercedes-Benz C | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 251 mi | 244 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 360 mi | 349 mi |
| Motorway | 296 mi | 287 mi |
| City | 409 mi | 397 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Ford Mustang Mach-E
- Further in winter
- Ford Mustang Mach-E
- More efficient
- Ford Mustang Mach-E
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Ford Mustang Mach-E or the Mercedes-Benz C?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Ford Mustang Mach-E is rated 379 mi and the Mercedes-Benz C 368 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 251 mi from the Ford Mustang Mach-E and 244 mi from the Mercedes-Benz C.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.