Ford Puma Gen-E vs Peugeot e-2008
How the Ford Puma Gen-E and the Peugeot e-2008 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Ford Puma Gen-E | Peugeot e-2008 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 234 mi | 212 mi |
| Usable battery | 43.6 kWh | 45 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 13.1 kWh/100 km | 15.8 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2025 | 2023 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Ford Puma Gen-E | Peugeot e-2008 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 155 mi | 140 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 222 mi | 201 mi |
| Motorway | 182 mi | 165 mi |
| City | 252 mi | 229 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Ford Puma Gen-E
- Further in winter
- Ford Puma Gen-E
- More efficient
- Ford Puma Gen-E
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Ford Puma Gen-E or the Peugeot e-2008?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Ford Puma Gen-E is rated 234 mi and the Peugeot e-2008 212 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 155 mi from the Ford Puma Gen-E and 140 mi from the Peugeot e-2008.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.