Lucid Gravity vs Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan
How the Lucid Gravity and the Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Lucid Gravity | Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 442 mi | 441 mi |
| Usable battery | 123 kWh | 118 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 18.2 kWh/100 km | 17.1 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2026 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Lucid Gravity | Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 293 mi | 292 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 420 mi | 419 mi |
| Motorway | 345 mi | 344 mi |
| City | 478 mi | 476 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Lucid Gravity
- Further in winter
- Lucid Gravity
- More efficient
- Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Lucid Gravity or the Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Lucid Gravity is rated 442 mi and the Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan 441 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 293 mi from the Lucid Gravity and 292 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQS Sedan.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.