Mazda CX-6e vs Opel Grandland Electric
How the Mazda CX-6e and the Opel Grandland Electric compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mazda CX-6e | Opel Grandland Electric | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 301 mi | 300 mi |
| Usable battery | 76 kWh | 73 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 17.9 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2025 | 2026 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mazda CX-6e | Opel Grandland Electric | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 199 mi | 198 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 286 mi | 285 mi |
| Motorway | 235 mi | 234 mi |
| City | 325 mi | 324 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Mazda CX-6e
- Further in winter
- Mazda CX-6e
- More efficient
- Mazda CX-6e
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mazda CX-6e or the Opel Grandland Electric?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mazda CX-6e is rated 301 mi and the Opel Grandland Electric 300 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 199 mi from the Mazda CX-6e and 198 mi from the Opel Grandland Electric.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.