Mercedes-Benz C vs smart #5
How the Mercedes-Benz C and the smart #5 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mercedes-Benz C | smart #5 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 368 mi | 367 mi |
| Usable battery | 94 kWh | 94 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 18.5 kWh/100 km | 15.9 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2027 | 2025 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mercedes-Benz C | smart #5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 244 mi | 243 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 349 mi | 349 mi |
| Motorway | 287 mi | 286 mi |
| City | 397 mi | 396 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Mercedes-Benz C
- Further in winter
- Tie
- More efficient
- smart #5
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz C or the smart #5?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mercedes-Benz C is rated 368 mi and the smart #5 367 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 244 mi from the Mercedes-Benz C and 243 mi from the smart #5.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.