Mercedes-Benz EQA vs Toyota bZ4X
How the Mercedes-Benz EQA and the Toyota bZ4X compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQA | Toyota bZ4X | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 328 mi | 318 mi |
| Usable battery | 66.5 kWh | 69 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.7 kWh/100 km | 14.6 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2025 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQA | Toyota bZ4X | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 217 mi | 210 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 312 mi | 301 mi |
| Motorway | 256 mi | 248 mi |
| City | 354 mi | 343 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Mercedes-Benz EQA
- Further in winter
- Mercedes-Benz EQA
- More efficient
- Toyota bZ4X
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQA or the Toyota bZ4X?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mercedes-Benz EQA is rated 328 mi and the Toyota bZ4X 318 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 217 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQA and 210 mi from the Toyota bZ4X.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.