Mercedes-Benz EQS vs Volvo ES90
How the Mercedes-Benz EQS and the Volvo ES90 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQS | Volvo ES90 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 459 mi | 435 mi |
| Usable battery | 107.8 kWh | 102 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 16.7 kWh/100 km | 14.6 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2022 | 2026 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQS | Volvo ES90 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 304 mi | 288 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 436 mi | 413 mi |
| Motorway | 358 mi | 339 mi |
| City | 495 mi | 470 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Mercedes-Benz EQS
- Further in winter
- Mercedes-Benz EQS
- More efficient
- Volvo ES90
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQS or the Volvo ES90?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mercedes-Benz EQS is rated 459 mi and the Volvo ES90 435 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 304 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQS and 288 mi from the Volvo ES90.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.