Mercedes-Benz EQS vs Volvo EX60
How the Mercedes-Benz EQS and the Volvo EX60 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQS | Volvo EX60 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 459 mi | 503 mi |
| Usable battery | 107.8 kWh | 112 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 16.7 kWh/100 km | 16 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2022 | 2027 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Mercedes-Benz EQS | Volvo EX60 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 304 mi | 334 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 436 mi | 478 mi |
| Motorway | 358 mi | 393 mi |
| City | 495 mi | 544 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Volvo EX60
- Further in winter
- Volvo EX60
- More efficient
- Volvo EX60
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Mercedes-Benz EQS or the Volvo EX60?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Mercedes-Benz EQS is rated 459 mi and the Volvo EX60 503 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 304 mi from the Mercedes-Benz EQS and 334 mi from the Volvo EX60.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.