NIO ET5 vs XPeng P7
How the NIO ET5 and the XPeng P7 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| NIO ET5 | XPeng P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 360 mi | 358 mi |
| Usable battery | 90 kWh | 86.2 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.5 kWh/100 km | 16.8 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2025 | 2023 |
Real-world range, side by side
| NIO ET5 | XPeng P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 239 mi | 237 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 342 mi | 340 mi |
| Motorway | 281 mi | 279 mi |
| City | 389 mi | 386 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- NIO ET5
- Further in winter
- NIO ET5
- More efficient
- NIO ET5
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the NIO ET5 or the XPeng P7?
- On the official WLTP cycle the NIO ET5 is rated 360 mi and the XPeng P7 358 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 239 mi from the NIO ET5 and 237 mi from the XPeng P7.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.