Škoda Enyaq vs Volkswagen ID.4
How the Škoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.4 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Škoda Enyaq | Volkswagen ID.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 360 mi | 357 mi |
| Usable battery | 77 kWh | 77 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 15.3 kWh/100 km | 15.7 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2027 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Škoda Enyaq | Volkswagen ID.4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 239 mi | 236 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 342 mi | 339 mi |
| Motorway | 281 mi | 278 mi |
| City | 388 mi | 385 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Škoda Enyaq
- Further in winter
- Škoda Enyaq
- More efficient
- Škoda Enyaq
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Škoda Enyaq or the Volkswagen ID.4?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Škoda Enyaq is rated 360 mi and the Volkswagen ID.4 357 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 239 mi from the Škoda Enyaq and 236 mi from the Volkswagen ID.4.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.