Škoda Epiq vs Volkswagen ID. Polo
How the Škoda Epiq and the Volkswagen ID. Polo compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Škoda Epiq | Volkswagen ID. Polo | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 273 mi | 281 mi |
| Usable battery | 51.7 kWh | 52 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 13.7 kWh/100 km | 11.5 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2027 | 2026 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Škoda Epiq | Volkswagen ID. Polo | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 181 mi | 186 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 260 mi | 267 mi |
| Motorway | 213 mi | 219 mi |
| City | 295 mi | 303 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Volkswagen ID. Polo
- Further in winter
- Volkswagen ID. Polo
- More efficient
- Volkswagen ID. Polo
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Škoda Epiq or the Volkswagen ID. Polo?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Škoda Epiq is rated 273 mi and the Volkswagen ID. Polo 281 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 181 mi from the Škoda Epiq and 186 mi from the Volkswagen ID. Polo.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.