Citroën AMI vs Dacia Spring
How the Citroën AMI and the Dacia Spring compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Citroën AMI | Dacia Spring | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 47 mi | 140 mi |
| Usable battery | 5.4 kWh | 24.3 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 7.2 kWh/100 km | 12.4 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2024 | 2026 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Citroën AMI | Dacia Spring | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 31 mi | 93 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 44 mi | 133 mi |
| Motorway | 37 mi | 109 mi |
| City | 50 mi | 151 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Dacia Spring
- Further in winter
- Dacia Spring
- More efficient
- Citroën AMI
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Citroën AMI or the Dacia Spring?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Citroën AMI is rated 47 mi and the Dacia Spring 140 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 31 mi from the Citroën AMI and 93 mi from the Dacia Spring.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.