Dacia Spring vs Mazda MX-30
How the Dacia Spring and the Mazda MX-30 compare on real-world range, battery size and efficiency. WLTP is a lab figure — the winter, motorway and city estimates below show what each car really does on the road.
Specifications side by side
| Dacia Spring | Mazda MX-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| WLTP range | 140 mi | 124 mi |
| Usable battery | 24.3 kWh | 30 kWh |
| WLTP consumption | 12.4 kWh/100 km | 19 kWh/100 km |
| Model year | 2026 | 2024 |
Real-world range, side by side
| Dacia Spring | Mazda MX-30 | |
|---|---|---|
| Winter (−10 °C) | 93 mi | 82 mi |
| Warm weather (30 °C) | 133 mi | 118 mi |
| Motorway | 109 mi | 97 mi |
| City | 151 mi | 134 mi |
The verdict
- Longer range (WLTP)
- Dacia Spring
- Further in winter
- Dacia Spring
- More efficient
- Dacia Spring
Frequently asked questions
- Which has more range, the Dacia Spring or the Mazda MX-30?
- On the official WLTP cycle the Dacia Spring is rated 140 mi and the Mazda MX-30 124 mi. In cold winter driving (around −10 °C) expect roughly 93 mi from the Dacia Spring and 82 mi from the Mazda MX-30.
- Which electric car is more efficient?
- Efficiency is the WLTP energy use per 100 km, where lower is better — compare the consumption figures in the table above. The more efficient car uses less electricity for the same distance, so it costs less to charge.